Current:Home > MyThe White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars -Financium
The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars
View
Date:2025-04-15 18:18:43
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.
Under a plan announced Thursday, the government would consider overriding the patent for high-priced drugs that have been developed with the help of taxpayer money and letting competitors make them in hopes of driving down the cost.
In a 15-second video released to YouTube on Wednesday night, President Joe Biden promised the move would lower prices.
“Today, we’re taking a very important step toward ending price gouging so you don’t have to pay more for the medicine you need,” he said.
The administration did not immediately release details about how the process will work and how it will deem a drug costly enough to act. White House officials would not name drugs that might potentially be targeted.
There will be a 60-day public comment period. If the plan is enacted, drugmakers are almost certain to challenge it in court.
It’s the latest health policy pitch from a White House gearing up to make its efforts to tackle drug prices a central theme in next year’s reelection campaign. Biden frequently talks about the $35 cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees that went into effect this year, as well as a plan for government officials to negotiate some drug prices paid by Medicare for the first time in history.
The federal government, however, has never taken such a move against patents, a step called “march-in rights.” But some Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, has in recent years lobbied the Health and Human Services agency to do so with certain drugs.
The conditions for how those “march-in rights” would be used have long been debated. Pharmaceutical companies have pushed back on the idea that prices alone are enough for Washington to act against a drug’s patent. The process proposed by the administration would clarify that the drug’s patent could be in jeopardy if its price is out of reach for Americans, White House officials said.
“For the first time, ever, the high price of that taxpayer-funded drug is a factor in determining that the drug is not accessible to the public on reasonable terms,” said Biden domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden.
The plan could threaten future drugs, according to the pharmaceutical lobbying firm Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA.
“This would be yet another loss for American patients who rely on public-private sector collaboration to advance new treatments and cures,” PhRMA spokesperson Megan Van Etten said.
Pharmaceutical companies have long relied on government research to develop new drugs. The most recent major breakthrough was the development of COVID-19 vaccines. U.S. taxpayers invested billions of dollars in the effort and were able, until recently, to access treatments and preventions for the virus without paying out-of-pocket for them.
When the public invests heavily in a private company’s drug, it’s fair to question whether they should have to pay high prices for it, said William Pierce, a former HHS official during President George W. Bush’s administration.
“The question becomes – what reward should there be for the taxpayers who help fund this product?” Pierce said.
veryGood! (62748)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- San Diego dentist fatally shot by disgruntled former patient, prosecutors say
- Man convicted of 2 killings in Delaware and accused of 4 in Philadelphia gets 7 life terms
- Obesity drug Wegovy is approved to cut heart attack and stroke risk in overweight patients
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- NH troopers shoot and kill armed man during a foot pursuit with a police dog, attorney general says
- This 21-year-old Republican beat a 10-term incumbent. What’s next for Wyatt Gable?
- Hawaii firefighters get control of fire at a biomass power plant on Kauai
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Trump posts $91 million bond to appeal E. Jean Carroll defamation verdict
Ranking
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Fatal crash in western Wisconsin closes state highway
- Books on Main feels like you're reading inside a tree house in Wisconsin: See inside
- Vampire Diaries' Paul Wesley and Ines de Ramon Finalize Divorce Nearly 2 Years After Breakup
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Washington state achieves bipartisan support to ban hog-tying by police and address opioid crisis
- Fatal crash in western Wisconsin closes state highway
- Program that allows 30,000 migrants from 4 countries into the US each month upheld by judge
Recommendation
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
Hawaii firefighters get control of fire at a biomass power plant on Kauai
Authorities investigate oily sheen off Southern California coast
Spanish utility Iberdrola offers to buy remaining shares to take 100% ownership of Avangrid
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Peek inside the gift bags for Oscar nominees in 2024, valued at $178,000
A bill that could lead to a nation-wide TikTok ban is gaining momentum. Here’s what to know
Lilly Pulitzer 60% Off Deals: Your Guide To the Hidden $23 Finds No One Knows About