Current:Home > MyAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Financium
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-17 02:01:09
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (66353)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- 'The Bear' Season 3 finale: Is masterful chef Carmy finally cooked?
- Queer – and religious: How LGBTQ+ youths are embracing their faith in 2024
- U.S. soldier in Japan charged with sexually assaulting teenage girl in Okinawa
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Video shows a meteotsunami slamming Lake Michigan amid days of severe weather. Here's what to know.
- The Saipan surprise: How delicate talks led to the unlikely end of Julian Assange’s 12-year saga
- Celebrate With Target’s 4th of July Deals on Red, White, and *Cute* Styles, Plus 50% off Patio Furniture
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Things to know about how Julian Assange and US prosecutors arrived at a plea deal to end his case
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Lululemon's Hot July 4th Finds Start at Just $9: The Styles I Predict Will Sell Out
- Lakers reveal Bronny James' new jersey number
- Iowa's Supreme Court rules 6-week abortion ban can be enforced
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Chevron takeaways: Supreme Court ruling removes frequently used tool from federal regulators
- New Jersey governor signs budget boosting taxes on companies making over $10 million
- Dick Vitale reveals his cancer has returned: 'I will win this battle'
Recommendation
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
Supreme Court rejects Steve Bannon's bid to remain out of prison while appealing conviction
U.S. soldier in Japan charged with sexually assaulting teenage girl in Okinawa
The brutal killing of a Detroit man in 1982 inspires decades of Asian American activism nationwide
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
Amazon is reviewing whether Perplexity AI improperly scraped online content
Over 130,000 Baseus portable chargers recalled after 39 fires and 13 burn injuries
Kenya protests resume as President William Ruto's tax hike concession fails to quell anger