Current:Home > ContactAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Financium
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-20 00:13:16
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (745)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Biden and Germany’s Scholz will meet in Washington as US and EU aid for Ukraine hangs in the balance
- Native tribes don't want statue of William Penn removed. They want their story told.
- Trump praises Texas governor as border state clashes with Biden administration over immigration
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Eileen Gu chooses ‘All of the Above’ when faced with choices involving skiing, Stanford and style
- ‘Saltburn’ actor Barry Keoghan named Hasty Pudding’s Man of the Year
- The Boeing 737 Max 9 takes off again, but the company faces more turbulence ahead
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- NFL championship game picks: Who among Chiefs, Ravens, 49ers and Lions reaches Super Bowl 58?
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Fake George Carlin comedy special purportedly made with AI prompts lawsuit from his estate
- French farmers vow to continue protesting despite the government’s offer of concessions
- Greta Thunberg joins hundreds marching in England to protest airport’s expansion for private planes
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Record number of Americans are homeless amid nationwide surge in rent, report finds
- Nearly 25,000 tech workers were laid off in the first weeks of 2024. Why is that?
- What is UNRWA, the main aid provider in Gaza that Israel accuses of militant links?
Recommendation
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Former NBA All-Star DeMarcus 'Boogie' Cousins spotted making bubble tea for fans in Taiwan
'Buffalo Fluffalo' has had enuffalo in this kids' bookalo
Live updates | UN court keeps genocide case against Israel alive as Gaza death toll surpasses 26,000
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Nitrogen hypoxia execution was sold as 'humane' but witnesses said Kenneth Smith was gasping for air
Former NBA All-Star DeMarcus 'Boogie' Cousins spotted making bubble tea for fans in Taiwan
A Publicly-Owned Landfill in Alabama Caught Fire and Smoldered for 50 Days. Nearby Residents Were Left in the Dark